VelphaDocs
Investing FundamentalsChapter 4 — Build a Portfolio

4-4 The Basics of Rebalancing and Review

A page on how to tidy up when an allocation drifts, and the order to review things in

So far we have covered what to hold, how to read diversification across equities and funds, and how to think about weights. But however carefully you design it, an allocation drifts naturally over time. Rebalancing is not about returning to the original weights precisely every time — it is the work of tidying up against a target allocation and tolerance band you set in advance.

What you'll learn
  • The point of rebalancing is not to be right about the future but to tidy the allocation against your target and tolerance band.
  • When reviewing, look at allocation, overlap, cost, and changes in your circumstances — not just products.
  • To avoid acting on emotion, decide your target allocation, tolerance band, and review frequency up front.
  • When the allocation drifts, separate returning to the original design from changing the target allocation itself.

1. An allocation always drifts, even when built correctly

Start from the same allocation and, as some assets rise while others fall, the weights change naturally. In a phase where equities keep rising, for instance, the equity weight can creep up without your noticing, leaving you in a riskier state than when you started.

Allocations drift over time → rebalancing brings them back
When equities rise, the allocation drifts naturally. Rebalancing is not a market call — it returns you to the original design.
The allocation as designedIn balanceAs time passes…Equities grow and the allocation driftsAfter rebalancingBack to the designEquities40%Bonds25%REIT15%Deposits20%Equities55%Bonds18%REIT12%Deposits15%Equities40%Bonds25%REIT15%Deposits20%Market movesRebalance+15%Range of movement (annual)±7.6%Range of movement (annual)±10.1%+2.5pt ↑Range of movement (annual)±7.6%

2. When it drifts, separate returning to the design from changing it

When the market moves, portfolio weights drift naturally. The distinction to draw at that point is whether this drift only needs returning to the original design or whether my circumstances or purpose changed, so the target allocation itself should change.

Return to the design (rebalance) or change the design (redesign)
If it only drifted because the market moved, return to the target allocation. If your purpose or circumstances changed, revisit the target allocation itself before tidying up.
The allocation has driftedWhat changed?Only the market movedYour circumstances changedRebalanceReturn to the original designTarget allocation (unchanged)Equities 40%Bonds 25%REIT 15%Deposits 20%When to use it· Equities grew and their weight rose· A periodic check found it beyond your tolerance bandRedesignRevisit the target allocationNew target allocation (example)Equities 25%Bonds 45%REIT 10%Deposits 20%When to use it· The date you need the money is closer, or your income changed· The movement you can tolerate changed
How to think about review rules
TriggerHow to think about it
A periodic check every six or twelve monthsEasy to review without acting on emotion
Drifting well outside the tolerance bandEasy to correct the gap against the target allocation
A life eventIf purpose or horizon changed, revisit the allocation too

First, if your purpose, horizon, and when you need the money have not changed, the default is return to the original design. If the equity weight has simply risen or fallen temporarily because of the market, tidying up against your target allocation and tolerance band is enough.

If instead something changed — a life event brought the date you need the money closer, your income or household headroom shifted, or you have become less able to absorb large moves than before — returning to the original is not enough. In that case, you need to revisit the target allocation itself.

On this page